Policy implications of using subjective poverty measurement
Considering people’s own understanding of wellbeing offers a view of poverty that objective income or expenditure measures do not cover. Subjective poverty measures assert that poor people have a far better ability to assess their wellbeing than most development professionals. They also highlight dimensions of wellbeing that are most valued by the poor.
Recommended reading
- Subjective measures of well-being
- ( R. Veenhoven / World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) , 2004)
- This paper explores the issue of subjective measures of well being and asks whether they can be used in policy making, particularly in developing countries. In distinguishing between 'subjective subst...
- Experiences of Uganda's PPA in implementing and monitoring poverty reduction
- ( R. Ssewakiryange / International Institute for Environment and Development , 2005)
- Uganda’s Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP) incorporates poor people’s voices and perspectives. This paper focuses on the lessons learnt in the implementation of the PEAP by using exam...
- Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?
- ( A. Singh-Manoux;M.G. Marmot;N.E. Adler / American Psychosomatic Society , 2005)
- Is a persons’ health status better predicted by their subjective or objective socioeconomic status? This article examines this question and finds that: ...
- Is there a divergence between objective measures and subjective perceptions of poverty trends? Evidence from West and Central Africa
- ( Q. Wodon / World Bank , 2007)
- Certain African countries have experienced economic growth in recent years, yet people do not report that their poverty situation has improved. This brief asks to what extent is there a divergence bet...






